tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12279128.post1734225657980054654..comments2022-11-19T09:12:57.640-06:00Comments on Cowan Chronicles: Spider-Man and the Mortification of SinSteve Cowanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07075683279641891756noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12279128.post-18022913497276194662013-11-13T05:35:35.085-06:002013-11-13T05:35:35.085-06:00Unquestionably believe that which you stated.
Your...Unquestionably believe that which you stated.<br />Your favorite reason appeared to be on the web the simplest thing <br />to be aware of. I say to you, I definitely get irked while people consider worries that they just don't <br />know about. You managed to hit the nail upon the top and also defined out the whole thing without <br />having side-effects , people could take a signal.<br />Will likely be back to get more. Thanks<br /><br />my website novoline welches spiel ist am besten (<a href="http://thenewcomfortzone.com/jcow/blogs/viewstory/588574" rel="nofollow"></a>)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12279128.post-9465351602260234292007-09-07T16:50:00.000-05:002007-09-07T16:50:00.000-05:00Maybe I can help clarify a couple of things:One re...Maybe I can help clarify a couple of things:<BR/><BR/>One reason you've heard a lot of people say they didn't like the movie was a certain disconnect from the comic book origins of the characters and events portrayed. For example, a lot of die-hard Spidey fans I know absolutely HATED the way that Venom was portrayed. In the comics, Venom is this large, muscular guy who had worked for a rival newspaper (the Daily Globe, in the comics), and had gone out on a limb to expose the real identity of this villian who called himself the Sin-Eater (kind of a modern-day Jack the Ripper who used a shotgun instead of a knife), during a 4-issue arc way back in "Peter Parker the Spectacular Spider-Man", I BELIEVE #'s 107-110. Spider-Man unmasked the villian and proved Brock wrong, leading Brock to hate Spider-Man with a vengeance. In the movie, he's portrayed by Topher Grace as being kind of the dark-side of Spider-Man (something I figured when I first heard Grace had been cast in the film). Sam Raimi took a LOT of liberties with Venom, and it ticked some people off. Other people just hated "emo-Peter," who was being turned to the "dark side" by the black suit. It got a chuckle out of my friend Justin, though, so I didn't mind it so much the first time I saw it. ALL THREE movies had some truly hokey moments... that's just Sam Raimi and his sense of humor.<BR/><BR/>The church scenario is straight out of "Web of Spider-Man" #1. Before Venom was even introduced, the black suit managed to escape confinement in the Fantastic Four's HQ, and sought down Spidey, leading to an issue-long struggle to get the thing off his body. It had already been revealed that the suit was weak to sonics, so the struggle was concluded in a church's bell tower. The point in the issue was that being that close to a ringing church bell should've turned anyone's brains to mush, and Peter would rather have died than let the suit take over. <BR/><BR/>What Sam Raimi did was take some of the more compelling scenes from the comics (such as the church sequence), and gave his own spin on the events. Whether or not he intentionally had a spiritual metaphor in mind, I honestly can't say. I would suggest that at least some of it is deliberate, as Spider-Man 2 had some VERY distinct and obvious references to Christianity (I'm thinking of the end of the elevated train scenario). But I have no idea what Sam Raimi's beliefs are, so I can't verify or rebutt.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com