I have been watching with great interest the growing states' rights movement. Many states have introduced and some have recently passed resolutions asserting their sovereignty over the federal government under the 10th Amendment, an constitutional amendment all but forgotten these days by conservatives and liberals alike. This amendment was designed to make explicit what was implicit in many parts of the constitution and was presupposed by most of the Founders, namely, that the United States was a federation of sovereign, independent states (read: nations), and not a singular nation. The federal goverment was not designed as a national government, but as an extention of the various state governments designed to serve their collective interests. The set-up was intended, in part, to preserve the sovereignty of the states except within a very narrow range of responsibilities delegated the federal government. Thus, it was also intented to preserve individual liberties.
The current states' rights movement is trying to prevent and roll back the incroaching tyranny of an all-encompassing and all-powerful national government that is presently, let's face it, leading us gradually (but not too gradually!) into socialism and the eradication of personal liberty. I encourage the readers to learn more about this movement by visiting the website of the Tenth Ammendment Center (www.tenthamendmentcenter.com). For some history of the constitution's emphasis on liberty and states' rights and its application for today, read this helpful article by Frank Chodorov:
http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/09/30/state-sovereignty-a-revolutionary-movement/
Oct 2, 2009
Sep 24, 2009
Atheists Endorse ID Theory
Believe it or not, a growing number of atheists and agnostics are endorsing intelligent design theory as legtimate science. Some are even going so far as to say that it provides evidence for a purposive designer (though not necessarily God) that is superior to to any evidence in favor of Darwinism. The "wedge" that Phillip Johnson started hammering in the 1990s into the "log" of Darwinist hegemony over science is finally starting to split the log! Read about this amazing development in an article by Peter Williams at the website of the Evangelical Philosophical Society. Here's the link:
http://epsociety.org/library/articles.asp?pid=66&ap=1
http://epsociety.org/library/articles.asp?pid=66&ap=1
Jun 23, 2009
Interview for The Love of Wisdom
Jim Spiegel and I have been interviewed by Joe Gorra at the website of the Evangelical Philosophical Society concerning our new book, The Love of Wisdom: A Christian Introduction to Philosophy. You can link to the interview here:
http://www.epsociety.org/blog/labels/love%20of%20wisdom%20(book).asp
http://www.epsociety.org/blog/labels/love%20of%20wisdom%20(book).asp
May 30, 2009
Article on Women's Subordination
For those who have an interest in the debate among evangelicals regarding the subordination of women to their husbands and male leadership in church, my article "The Metaphysics of Subordination: A Response to Rebecca Merrill Groothuis," has just been published in the Journal of Biblical Manhood and Womanhood. You can read the article here:
http://www.cbmw.org/Journal/Vol-14-No-1/The-Metaphysics-of-Subordination-A-Response-to-Rebecca-Merrill-Groothuis
The gist of the article is this: Groothuis argues that the common distinction made by complementarians between women being subordinate in role but equal in being/value is logically incoherent. I argue that she is mistaken, that the distinction is coherent. Unless I am mistaken, this exchange between Groothuis and myself represents the first time that more or less pure philosophy has entered into this debate.
http://www.cbmw.org/Journal/Vol-14-No-1/The-Metaphysics-of-Subordination-A-Response-to-Rebecca-Merrill-Groothuis
The gist of the article is this: Groothuis argues that the common distinction made by complementarians between women being subordinate in role but equal in being/value is logically incoherent. I argue that she is mistaken, that the distinction is coherent. Unless I am mistaken, this exchange between Groothuis and myself represents the first time that more or less pure philosophy has entered into this debate.
May 27, 2009
Article on the Meaning of Life
I was just invited to post a short article on the meaning of life from an evangelical perspective on the Patheos Public Square website. This is a cite that posts multiple viewpoints on important and current topics that impact our society. You can read my piece at:
http://www.patheos.com/Explore/Additional-Resources/Why-Me-God-and-the-Meaning-of-Life.html
Enjoy!
http://www.patheos.com/Explore/Additional-Resources/Why-Me-God-and-the-Meaning-of-Life.html
Enjoy!
May 26, 2009
Thomas Sowell on Obama's Supreme Court Pick
Barack Obama has made his first Supreme Court appointment, justice Sonia Sotomayor. Even the most casual follower of the story can see that she is the posterchild for postmodern political correctness and judicial activism. By her own testimony her gender and ethnicity will influence her decisions. And she thinks that someone (like herself) of a particular ethnicity and gender may be better equipped to make certain decisions because of her ability to "empathize." Forget the rule of law and the facts of the case--what matters is empathy! One wonders, given her postmodern view of law and culture, if she can empathize with a white male who stands before her bar looking for justice? On her own terms, we already know the answer. I encourage readers to read the commentary by Thomas Sowell on Sotomayor's appointment at this link:
http://townhall.com/Columnists/ThomasSowell/2009/05/27/sotomayor__empathy_in_action?page=full&comments=true
http://townhall.com/Columnists/ThomasSowell/2009/05/27/sotomayor__empathy_in_action?page=full&comments=true
May 25, 2009
The Missing Link? Gimme a Break!
Before you watch the HistoryChannel's "The Link" program tonight about the new primate fossil "Ida" that is all the rage the last few days, take a look at this link:
http://www.arn.org/blogs/index.php/2/2009/05/20/ida_the_holy_grail_of_evolutionary_specu_1
The author easily debunks all the hype.
http://www.arn.org/blogs/index.php/2/2009/05/20/ida_the_holy_grail_of_evolutionary_specu_1
The author easily debunks all the hype.
May 13, 2009
Good Discussion of Waterboarding
Rich Lowery has written an insightful post on the ethics of waterboarding, making some points that are seldom heard in the debate--such as the fact that the morality of this practice depends on the context or circumstances in which it is used. Obviously, there are situations where it would clearly be wrong, but that doesn't rule out the possibility of morally permissible cases. See Lowery's column at this link:
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=OTE1NGU4NDQxOWU2YTZiOWM2N2Q4YjQ4OGEzZjZhZGM=&w=MQ==
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=OTE1NGU4NDQxOWU2YTZiOWM2N2Q4YjQ4OGEzZjZhZGM=&w=MQ==
May 12, 2009
Spiegel on Cowan and Spiegel's Book
Please check out Jim Spiegel's comments concerning our new book The Love of Wisdom (B&H, 2009) on his blog (link below). He does a great job explaining some of our reasons for writing the book and the benefits we hope it gives the readers. Look for comments of my own in the next few days.
http://wisdomandfollyblog.com/
http://wisdomandfollyblog.com/
Apr 21, 2009
Cowan on Moody Radio
For those who might be interested, I will be appearing briefly on Moody Radio South tomorrow morning (April 22, 2009) at approx. 6:40 AM (central time), WMFT Radio FM 88.9. I speak about the need for theology and apologetics in the church to help the church be salt and light in the world.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)